Welcome
Accessibility Navigator is a fully independent, plain-language platform built to decode complex systems like Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services (DDS), MassHealth, and waiver services—so you can focus on making informed, confident decisions.
* Note: Information is based on public guidance and not directly affiliated with any agency. For authoritative details, consult official state resources.
Helping families and providers navigate the Massachusetts DDS and MassHealth system clearly, confidently, and with the dignity every adult deserves. If you find the content helpful, consider supporting us through responsible ads, sponsorship, or direct collaboration.
Guardianship is a legal process where a court appoints an individual to make personal, medical, or financial decisions on behalf of another adult who is deemed incapacitated. Below, explore the different types of guardianship and their legal process in Massachusetts.
CLICK below to learn more about Rogers Guardianship or Standard Guardianship
This is a realistic example of a goal approved by DDS for individuals receiving Community-Based Day Supports (CBDS) or Day Habilitation services. Goals are written to be person-centered, measurable, and reviewed as part of the Individual Support Plan (ISP) process.
Demonstrate the ability to communicate wants, needs, and preferences using verbal or non-verbal methods during daily activities with minimal prompting.
Review Schedule: Objectives will be reviewed quarterly by the interdisciplinary team. Adjustments will be made as needed based on data trends, therapeutic recommendations, or changes in individual needs or preferences.
Data will be collected by DSPs using daily tracking sheets and narrative notes. Staff will document the communication method used, the number of prompts required, and any environmental/contextual factors influencing the interaction.
Progress is measured through consistency, generalization, and decreased reliance on prompts. Skills are considered emerging, maintained, or regressed based on quarterly data analysis.
If objectives are not being met over two consecutive quarters, a comprehensive team review will be conducted to modify strategies, supports, or goals as appropriate.
Person-Centered Approach: All goals are designed to enhance independence, dignity, and quality of life, and are updated annually or as the individual's needs, preferences, and circumstances evolve.
Click each button below for an overview of the service activities, including the metrics and parameters guiding them.
Every individual in a Massachusetts DDS day program has fundamental rights to dignity, respect, and person-centered services. These rights are protected through comprehensive regulations, oversight mechanisms, and accountability measures designed to ensure quality care and meaningful outcomes.
Source index for DDS regulations: DDS 115 CMR (official).
Your voice, your choices, your rights
Your ISP is developed with your input and serves as the foundation for all services. This plan reflects your goals, preferences, and support needs while ensuring your voice is heard.
Cited regulation: 115 CMR 6.00 (overview), §6.23 Development of ISPs.
If your current program no longer meets your needs or preferences, you can explore and transition to different providers or services with your team.
Related guidance: DDS Office of Human Rights.
Your primary contact for service planning and concerns
On-site advocate for rights protection and complaint resolution
Independent legal advocacy and rights protection services
Peer support and self-advocacy skill development
Overview of safeguards: DDS Human Rights Resources (PDF).
Ensuring quality, safety, and compliance
DDS-approved providers must maintain robust human rights oversight through designated personnel and established committees.
Cited regulation: 115 CMR 3.09 Protection of Human Rights / Human Rights Committees (PDF).
All direct support staff complete required training tied to dignity, human rights, documentation, crisis response, and reporting.
Identifying signs and mandatory reporting procedures
Understanding DDS and federal compliance requirements
De-escalation techniques and emergency response protocols
Proper record-keeping and incident reporting
Related standards: 115 CMR 5.00 Standards to Promote Dignity (PDF).
See: 115 CMR 5.00 (PDF) and 115 CMR 3.09 (PDF).
Measuring progress and ensuring excellence
Every individual's ISP includes measurable goals that reflect personal priorities and growth opportunities. Progress is continuously monitored through data collection and regular team reviews.
Consistent data collection and analysis to track meaningful progress toward goals
Goals can be modified based on progress, preferences, or changing circumstances
Regular team meetings involving the individual, family, and support professionals
Cited regulation: 115 CMR §6.23 (ISP development).
Providers gather feedback from participants and families about service quality and effectiveness, and integrate it into continuous improvement.
Related standards: 115 CMR 5.00 (PDF).
Satisfaction feedback informs service improvements, staff training priorities, and program enhancements to ensure person-centered excellence.
For crisis/ restraint review requirements, see 115 CMR 5.00 (PDF) and §5.11 Crisis Prevention, Response, and Restraint.
Click on a case study below and explore our collection designed to illustrate common experiences and pathways within Massachusetts' DDS and MassHealth DH services. These scenarios are based on typical interactions and situations encountered in the field, providing insights into the processes of Day Habilitation, CBDS, and transportation services. It's important to note that these case studies are fictionalized representations and do not reflect any specific individuals or confidential information. They serve as educational tools to help individuals, caregivers, and providers better understand the complexities and possibilities within these essential service systems.
Mary, a 21-year-old student, is preparing to transition out of her specialized educational program, which extended her high school experience from ages 18 to 22 with continued training and supports. As she approaches her 22nd birthday in three months, she and her Independent Educational Plan (IEP) team must explore and identify a suitable Day Program that aligns with her goals, interests, and support needs.
While she has met some local providers at a **Transition Fair** hosted by her high school, the Department of Developmental Services (DDS) has also provided her and her guardians with an extensive list of additional providers. To ensure a smooth transition, her team must coordinate program visits, assess available services, and determine the best fit for her long-term success.
With the information gathered from the Transition Fair and recommendations from DDS, Mary’s guardians coordinated tours of five different Day Programs. During each visit, she had the opportunity to observe program activities, interact with staff and participants, and assess the level of support offered.
After careful consideration and discussions with her team, Mary selected a program that offered a **comprehensive blend of services** tailored to her needs, including:
To facilitate a smooth transition, her family secured **PT-1 transportation approvals** for travel to and from her **Day Habilitation program**. Additionally, **DDS-funded transportation** was arranged for **community outings and employment-related activities**, ensuring that Mary had reliable access to all aspects of her chosen program.
Mary successfully adjusted to her new program, gradually building confidence, social connections, and practical skills. The combination of services provided her with **a structured yet flexible environment**, enabling her to develop greater independence and actively participate in her community.
Through **CBDS and Group Employment**, she engaged in meaningful activities, learned job-related skills, and established **natural support systems** within her community. Her transition highlights the importance of early planning, informed decision-making, and personalized programming in supporting young adults as they move from school-based services into adult disability services.
Carlos, a 43-year-old individual with an intellectual disability, had a strong desire to enter the workforce but faced significant challenges in accessing job training and securing employment. While his Community-Based Day Supports (CBDS) program provided social and vocational activities, Carlos and his team recognized the need for additional structured employment services.
Working collaboratively, his Day Program submitted a Service Change Form to the Department of Developmental Services (DDS) to request Independent Employment hours, ensuring Carlos could receive the necessary support for job placement and retention.
Carlos continued participating in his CBDS program while also transitioning into employment-focused training through Independent Employment hours. His individualized employment plan included:
To enhance his transition, Carlos worked closely with Job Developers and Job Coaches throughout the week, refining his workplace skills, building confidence, and preparing for the demands of an independent job setting.
Transportation was a key component of Carlos' employment plan. Through a DDS-funded provider, he received dedicated transportation services to ensure he could reliably attend job interviews, vocational training sessions, and ultimately, his new workplace.
Additionally, he met regularly with a Job Developer or Job Coach, who provided ongoing support during job interviews, the hiring process, and onboarding at his new workplace.
After six months of intensive training and coaching, Carlos successfully secured a part-time job in a supportive work environment. With continued job coaching, he has gained independence, improved his workplace skills, and achieved greater financial stability. His success highlights the effectiveness of CBDS-to-Independent Employment transitions, reinforcing the value of structured support in helping individuals with disabilities achieve their career goals.
Susan, a 58-year-old individual, requires a higher level of care than her current day program can provide. She has medical needs, including a feeding tube that requires nursing oversight, and requires ADL (Activities of Daily Living) support using a Hoyer lift for safe transfers. Given these needs, Susan and her guardian have agreed to explore Full-Time Day Habilitation (FTDH) programs that can better support her daily care and enhance her overall well-being.
With guidance from her care team and guardian, Susan toured several FTDH programs, prioritizing options that provide:
Susan's transportation is coordinated through a PT-1 authorization, ensuring reliable access to and from her new FTDH program.
Susan successfully transitioned to a Full-Time Day Habilitation program that meets her medical and personal care needs. With appropriate nursing support, ADL accommodations, and engaging activities, she can enjoy a fulfilling daily routine in a safe and supportive environment.
Billy is a 21-year-old student preparing to exit his school district’s special education services under the 688 transition plan. He has a documented intellectual disability and a history of high-risk behaviors, including episodes requiring physical restraints at school. With just three months until he turns 22, his IEP team, guardians, and DDS Service Coordinator are working to find a Day Program that can safely continue the behavioral supports and progress already achieved in school.
The IEP team coordinated with multiple Day Habilitation providers offering behavioral clinical support and low staff-to-individual ratios (1:1 or 1:2). Billy toured two facilities with his guardian and school liaison. He connected positively with a Developmental Specialist and expressed interest in activities involving physical movement and puzzles.
Due to his behavior history, Billy is eligible for supervised, DDS-funded transportation. A specialized provider with trained escorts was selected.
Billy began transitioning gradually into the program with a 1:1 DSP and consistent visual schedules. Over time, his outbursts decreased and he began using his coping tools. Quarterly reviews show significant stability and increased participation in structured CBDS activities. The team is now exploring adding music-based group sessions to support his regulation and communication.
Sarah, a 34-year-old woman who uses a power wheelchair independently, currently volunteers at a community library and is eager to take the next step toward paid work. She is looking for a DH and CBDS program that will support her employment goals, offer accessible social activities, and help her meet new friends. She lives at home with supportive parents and uses PT-1 transportation.
Sarah and her family worked with a DDS Job Developer to tour 3 DH and CBDS programs with employment groups and strong community inclusion. Her chosen provider offered:
Sarah continues to use PT-1 transportation. Her job coach can meet her directly in the community when needed when out during CBDS hours. She will also be provided transportation from the Job Coach to her group supported employment.
Sarah recently secured a part-time job at a local library and continues attending her CBDS program 3 days per week. She is part of a group site developed by the program that includes peers that wanted to work in the library. She’s made new friends through group activities and even helped launch a “Book Club Fridays” session. Her program staff report she is thriving socially and gaining confidence.
Janice is a 45-year-old woman currently enrolled in a Full-Time Day Habilitation program that offers only limited community engagement. She enjoys bowling, mini golf, and visiting museums but feels stuck in a daily routine of in-building activities. She and her guardian approached DDS requesting a new program with greater community access and fun outings.
Janice toured two blended programs offering both Day Hab and CBDS hours. She chose one that offers:
PT-1 and DDS-funded community transportation were authorized, including mileage to off-site activities.
Janice is now accessing the community 4 out of 5 days per week. Her weekly highlights include art museum visits and bowling with peers. She continues to receive therapeutic supports in the morning through Day Hab. Her happiness and attendance have significantly improved.
Kelvin, a 58-year-old man with no medical needs, is seeking a CBDS-only program that allows him to avoid being inside a facility altogether. He enjoys fishing, going to the gym, and being outdoors. He lives independently and requested a program that offers a “without walls” model where participants go straight into the community.
Kelvin and his DDS Service Coordinator toured 3 programs offering community-based services. One provider stood out by offering:
The program coordinates DDS-funded pickup and drop-off directly from Kelvin’s home, aligning with his goals of avoiding buildings entirely.
Kelvin reports improved mood, physical health, and enjoyment. His week includes gym workouts, fishing spots, and small groups of friends with shared interests. He is a strong advocate for this model and now helps new program participants learn the ropes.
Laura, a 70-year-old woman experiencing early dementia symptoms, is looking for a safe, part-time Day Habilitation program. She enjoys arts & crafts, Bingo, and dancing while seated (chair Zumba). Her family wants to maintain her social skills and prevent isolation while ensuring safety and support for memory loss.
Laura’s guardian worked with DDS and the Aging & Disability Resource Center to identify a program that offers:
PT-1 transportation was authorized for two days per week with wheelchair-accessible service and caregiver assistance.
Laura is now attending her FTDH program every Tuesday and Thursday. She looks forward to Bingo, crafts, and social lunches with peers. Her family reports improved mood, cognitive engagement, and peace of mind knowing she is in a dementia-aware environment.
Robert, a 33-year-old male, is currently in a CBDS-only program. However, due to recent medical changes, he now requires consistent OT and PT services. His care team determined that a blended program with both CBDS and Day Habilitation hours would better meet his ongoing therapeutic and support needs.
Robert's team submitted a program change request through DDS and explored local blended programs offering:
PT-1 transportation was approved to and from the new program five days per week, with additional community-based mileage funded through DDS for CBDS activities.
Robert now receives consistent therapy and is showing improved functional gains. He participates in a daily walking group and enjoys painting during CBDS time. His ISP team has noted better mood and progress toward mobility goals.
Jennifer has been volunteering successfully but her current program lacks active job coaches due to staffing shortages. Her DDS team decided it's time to help her access a more supportive setting focused on group-supported employment opportunities.
Jennifer and her guardian met with programs offering:
Jennifer’s new program arranged PT-1 to support in-building services.
Jennifer now works twice a week with a group at a local animal shelter. Her job coach reports she is thriving and expressing readiness for more independence.
Sammy recently moved to Massachusetts from a state with limited adult services. She is looking for a Full-Time Day Habilitation (FTDH) program where she can work on her walking gait with PT and continue communication goals with speech therapy.
Sammy and her guardian explored programs offering:
Sammy was approved for PT-1 rides to the FTDH program.
Sammy is now walking longer distances with PT support and participating in social activities, including painting groups and Bingo. Her speech therapist reports progress on articulation goals.
Bran, age 44, refuses to attend or participate in his current CBDS program. He frequently expresses dissatisfaction and paranoia, sometimes becoming aggressive. His guardian and DDS team agreed it is time to transition him to a more structured, therapeutic Full-Time Day Habilitation (FTDH) program.
Bran’s team toured programs offering:
Due to safety concerns, a specialized DDS transportation vendor with trained escorts was arranged. No CBDS hours are used currently.
Bran has begun to attend with improved consistency. His clinician has identified preferred calming activities, and data shows reduced incidents of aggression during structured routines.
Bri is a 28-year-old woman who enjoys using social media but lacks safety awareness online. Her guardians requested a CBDS program focused on technology safety, peer relationships, and boundaries. They do not want her working until she demonstrates improved judgment and digital safety.
Bri toured CBDS-only programs offering:
PT-1 transportation was approved completed by the new day program.
Bri is now demonstrating better online habits and seeks adult guidance when unsure. She participates in group discussions on boundaries and is building peer connections through volunteering at a senior center.
Paul is a 41-year-old male with chronic pain and a G-Tube. He is NPO and reacts strongly to food smells, often becoming aggressive or engaging in SIB. He has attempted to drink unsafe liquids and requires 1:1 eyes-on supervision at all times.
His team is seeking a new program offering:
Paul’s new program arranged trained transportation aides through a PT-1.
Paul has shown reduced aggression and reports feeling calmer. He enjoys individualized sensory activities and has expressed appreciation for a quieter space.
Cathy is a cheerful 33-year-old woman who enjoys child-like play and frequently brings toys to program. Her team would like her to expand into more age-appropriate activities while supporting her social growth.
Cathy’s ISP team sought a Full-Time Day Hab (FTDH) program with:
Cathy’s PT-1 rides was submitted by her new program and approved.
Cathy is now participating in music and crafting clubs. She enjoys telling staff about her day and has started initiating conversations with new peers.
Bret engages in head-hitting SIB behaviors when upset and has a protocol involving helmet use. His team believes that a more engaging schedule will help reduce triggers and self-injury episodes.
Bret toured Day Habilitation programs with:
Transportation included staffed that were trained on his Behavioral Plan approved through a PT-1.
Bret now participates in a daily drumming group and sensory crafts. His incidents of head-hitting have decreased, and he wears his helmet less often.
Sal is relocating to a new group home and can no longer commute to his current day program. He is seeking a blended CBDS and Day Hab program close to his new residence and needs a gradual transition schedule.
His team created a soft-start plan and toured programs offering:
PT-1 arranged transportation with coordination with the group home on pick up and drop off times.
Sal has begun making friends and participates in board game groups. He now attends 5 days a week and no longer clings to staff for social comfort.
Kelly, age 63, exhibits attention-seeking behaviors and emotional dysregulation. Her current program is not supportive, and she is unaware that peers often bully her. Her team agrees that a fresh start after 15 years is needed.
Her team found a blended program offering:
Kelly’s PT-1 rides continued uninterrupted with her new route updated through MassHealth.
Kelly has made new friends and enjoys staff-led yoga and journaling groups. She reports feeling happier and more included at her new program.
Carol enjoys cooking and baking but her current program cut those activities due to staffing. The daily schedule has become repetitive and lacks enrichment. Her team is searching for a CBDS/DH program that supports her hobbies and adds variety.
The team explored programs offering:
Carol’s program submitted a PT-1 that was approved.
Carol now bakes weekly with her peers and leads a snack group. She says the new activities make her feel proud and helpful.
Jose spends most of his time doing sensory-based activities, which he enjoys. However, his team is concerned about a lack of communication skill development and access to therapeutic services. His current program does not have OT, PT, SLP, or BCBA on staff.
Jose’s team sought a program offering:
Jose's new day program submitted a PT-1 that was approved and the new transportation provider was trained on his communication device.
Jose now works with his SLP three times a week and is using picture cards to make snack and break choices. His sensory needs are still supported, but with more skill-building embedded throughout the day.
Chapter 688 planning, DDS eligibility, and MassHealth Day Habilitation
“Turning 22” (Chapter 688) is the state’s planning process that helps students exit special education and move into adult services. It starts with a school-submitted Chapter 688 referral and continues with eligibility and program applications to the appropriate adult agency (e.g., DDS, MRC).
Tip: If you’re stuck, call your DDS Area Office or DDS Service Coordinator listed on the DDS Turning 22 page.
In MA adult programs (Day Habilitation & CBDS), “behavior supports” are delivered by qualified clinicians and must be person-centered, least-restrictive, and rights-affirming.
Behavioral approaches (including ABA techniques) are widely used, with strong evidence in children for improving skills and reducing interfering behaviors; national bodies recommend evidence-based behavioral interventions as part of care.
Some autistic people and advocates report harms from compliance-focused goals or insufficient attention to autonomy and sensory needs, and caution against efforts to make people “look non-autistic.” Modern practice emphasizes consent, dignity, and person-defined outcomes.
This section is educational. Confirm program details with your provider and official state sources.
Whether you're a provider preparing for your next audit or a family curious about oversight practices, understanding DDS and MassHealth audit expectations can ensure transparency, safety, and high-quality services.
💡 These reviews are public for transparency and can help individuals and guardians choose a provider that best meets their expectations. Always check when the last report was published and review trends across years.
This region-wide comparison helps families and advocates understand how Massachusetts stacks up against its neighbors in key service areas like adult day supports, oversight, and staffing. Rankings are based on public data, regulatory review, and transparency.
Click on any state to explore detailed information about its developmental disability services, strengths, weaknesses, and how you can advocate for improvements. All information is sourced from official state resources and advocacy organizations.
Massachusetts has the most transparent and detailed oversight in New England for adult DDS-funded services. Public audits, licensing scorecards, and robust regulations like 130 CMR 419.000 support quality and rights.
Rhode Island has invested in person-centered planning and published extensive redesign plans for services. However, provider capacity and waitlists remain concerns.
Connecticut offers similar program types to Massachusetts but does not publish provider-level audit scores. Oversight is handled through internal DPH and DDS audits, but families report difficulty accessing information.
Vermont uses a designated agency model for DD services and has strong self-advocacy networks. However, some families report inconsistency in service quality by region.
New Hampshire relies heavily on Area Agencies for service delivery. While this offers flexibility, oversight varies significantly and there are fewer centralized reports or scorecards.
Maine offers strong community inclusion values but has faced serious federal scrutiny and consent decrees over lack of adequate services for individuals with ID/DD. Waitlists and service caps remain an issue.
Rankings are based on analysis of state policies, service availability, oversight mechanisms, wait times, and transparency measures. Sources include official state websites, advocacy organization reports, federal oversight documents, and public data on service quality.
Key factors considered: service availability and quality, staffing standards and ratios, oversight and transparency, wait times, funding levels, and strength of advocacy networks.
This comparison is updated regularly to reflect changes in state policies and services. Last updated: April 2025.
Massachusetts-specific information sourced from DDS, MassHealth, and the state’s Human Service Transportation (HST) program.
To apply for DDS services, you complete an intake to determine eligibility. You can start through the Executive Office of Health and Human Services Virtual Gateway or by contacting a DDS office. An Eligibility Specialist will review documentation (e.g., testing and diagnostic records) and guide you through the process.
DDS offers supportive, community living, and residential services (including provider-operated group homes and shared living) tailored through the Individual Support Plan.
MassHealth eligibility depends on factors like income, age, and disability. You can apply online, by phone, by mail, or at a MassHealth Enrollment Center.
Day Habilitation and Community-Based Day Supports focus on person-centered goals and may include:
Contact the DDS office that received your application; staff can confirm where your file is in the process and next steps.
For medically necessary rides covered by MassHealth, providers/clinicians submit a PT-1 request through the Human Service Transportation (HST) program. MART is one of the state’s regional brokers that schedules/assigns trips after approval.
The following official resources were consulted to ensure the accuracy and transparency of the information shared on this website. All content is independently written and designed to help families, caregivers, and professionals understand available services—not to replace official legal or clinical advice.
About This Project
This website was created and is maintained independently by JMC Resources as an educational project. It is designed to help individuals, caregivers, and professionals better understand the structure and availability of services offered through the Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services (DDS) and MassHealth.
Information is based on publicly available regulations, state-issued guidance, and fictional experiences in the field. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by any government agency, provider, or company.
Please visit the Contact Page.